What evidence though?I've always said I would be open minded to any evidence presented by Heard. I didn't see all of his testimony but today there was an account by a joint friend of Heard and Depp who says he heard what sounded like Depp punch her and she dropped the phone. A little before that she had called him and put it on speaker phone. Then a day or two later he says he saw scratches on her face.
Did I hear that right? Admittedly he didn't see a punch and only heard what sounded like one. But perhaps his evidence is credible?
Don't forget the actually faked photograph pair that she claimed were two different photos because of lighting differences when i fact you can spend a minute in Photoshop/Lightroom playing with a few sliders and get the both images looking exactly the same and when superimposed, they match and align perfectly proving they are the exact same image lol.What evidence though?
I wouldn't say one persons testimony means anything without anything to back it up. Where are the pictures showing damage? Oh she has nothing apart from a few pictures showing very light brusing that could have happened in numerous ways. Where are the pictures where she has a broken nose/black eyes/punched with his rings? Those rings would act as knuckle dusters, there would be serious damage to anyone hit, along with Depp being injured himself his hands would be damaged. No medical records no nothing, it just doesn't line up.
Spoken testimony isn't enough at all. Specially when it's from a friend.
I missed that bit? Has she submitted two beating photos that are the same?How the lawyers didn't notice the images being identical I do not know, considering they were taken at different times "apparently" it would be impossible for every strand of hair to be in exactly the same position.