Poll: This Johnny Depp Stuff

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    361
  • Poll closed .
Soldato
Joined
8 Jun 2013
Posts
4,080
She originally claimed she never told the press about the TRO. then in the cross she slip slip that TMZ had been informed somehow.
she claimed she never assaulted anyone, it didn't happen and JD's team planted it in the press 6 years before the divorce filing.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
27,776
Location
Surrey
I've always said I would be open minded to any evidence presented by Heard. I didn't see all of his testimony but today there was an account by a joint friend of Heard and Depp who says he heard what sounded like Depp punch her and she dropped the phone. A little before that she had called him and put it on speaker phone. Then a day or two later he says he saw scratches on her face.

Did I hear that right? Admittedly he didn't see a punch and only heard what sounded like one. But perhaps his evidence is credible?
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Jan 2012
Posts
3,278
Location
UK
I've always said I would be open minded to any evidence presented by Heard. I didn't see all of his testimony but today there was an account by a joint friend of Heard and Depp who says he heard what sounded like Depp punch her and she dropped the phone. A little before that she had called him and put it on speaker phone. Then a day or two later he says he saw scratches on her face.

Did I hear that right? Admittedly he didn't see a punch and only heard what sounded like one. But perhaps his evidence is credible?
What evidence though?
I wouldn't say one persons testimony means anything without anything to back it up. Where are the pictures showing damage? Oh she has nothing apart from a few pictures showing very light brusing that could have happened in numerous ways. Where are the pictures where she has a broken nose/black eyes/punched with his rings? Those rings would act as knuckle dusters, there would be serious damage to anyone hit, along with Depp being injured himself his hands would be damaged. No medical records no nothing, it just doesn't line up.

Spoken testimony isn't enough at all. Specially when it's from a friend.
 
Last edited:

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
91,153
Location
South Coast
What evidence though?
I wouldn't say one persons testimony means anything without anything to back it up. Where are the pictures showing damage? Oh she has nothing apart from a few pictures showing very light brusing that could have happened in numerous ways. Where are the pictures where she has a broken nose/black eyes/punched with his rings? Those rings would act as knuckle dusters, there would be serious damage to anyone hit, along with Depp being injured himself his hands would be damaged. No medical records no nothing, it just doesn't line up.

Spoken testimony isn't enough at all. Specially when it's from a friend.
Don't forget the actually faked photograph pair that she claimed were two different photos because of lighting differences when i fact you can spend a minute in Photoshop/Lightroom playing with a few sliders and get the both images looking exactly the same and when superimposed, they match and align perfectly proving they are the exact same image lol.

In fact, I did just that:

I could have spent more time tweaking the balance but I gave up purely because of how comically laughable this "evidence" was to begin with.

Txc7aoK.gif
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Oct 2004
Posts
7,661
Location
Sunny Torbaydos
How the lawyers didn't notice the images being identical I do not know, considering they were taken at different times "apparently" it would be impossible for every strand of hair to be in exactly the same position.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
11,879
How the lawyers didn't notice the images being identical I do not know, considering they were taken at different times "apparently" it would be impossible for every strand of hair to be in exactly the same position.
I missed that bit? Has she submitted two beating photos that are the same?
 

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
91,153
Location
South Coast
Yes she claimed they were two individual photos, one with different lighting because the mirror's lights were on or something - Camille then asked if she had in fact photoshopped the images by changing the saturation to which AH declined the claim - I believe she remarked something about not knowing how to even photoshop.

None of the photos submitted contain any metadata for the record so it's all down to the verbal claim...
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
11,879
I guess it could be one of those camera modes that does a whole bunch in short succession? Seems odd to fake a photo but not go a little bit further on highlighting the injury...
 

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
91,153
Location
South Coast
Impossible - She claimed that the lights were on for one, to do that requires time between shots and as such no human can remain in that exact same position with every strand of hair etc being in the same place between the shots as well. And as shown above, it absolutely is just one image, with the 2nd one being edited to emphasise colour. On top of that these photos were supposedly taken by her friend, so it's not like it could be said the camera was on a tripod.
 
Top Bottom